When should ART workups be done: Following a tiered approach, or all on day one?

Complete ART workups should be performed before any embryo transfer.

Clinical Management of Infertility Associated with Endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review recent data that affected the clinical management of infertility associated with endometriosis. DATA SOURCES: We completed a PubMed review of all articles that included the following keywords: endometriosis, infertility, IVF, and ART. STUDY SELECTION: A study was selected based on the pertinence of the topic addressed in relation to the study's set objectives. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: All identified articles were first assessed based on a review of the abstract. Pertinent articles were reviewed in depth. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis interferes with natural conception primarily by altering the quality of gametes-oocytes and sperm-and early-stage embryos. On the contrary, recent data indicate that gametes and early-stage embryos are not altered in the case of ART. Surgery-a classical approach in yesteryears-does appear to improve ART outcomes and may affect ovarian reserve and the number of oocytes retrieved in ART. Surgery is thus more rarely opted for today and only when necessary; proceeding to fertility preservation prior to surgery is recommended. When ART is performed in women with endometriosis, it is recommended to use an antagonist or progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation approach followed by deferred embryo transfer. In this case, GnRH (gonadotropin releasing hormone) agonist is preferred for triggering ovulation, as it limits the risk of cyst formation as well as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Frozen embryo transfers are best performed in E2 (estradiol) and progesterone replacement cycle.

Do IVF culture conditions have an impact on neonatal outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Are embryo culture conditions, including type of incubator, oxygen tension, and culture media, associated with obstetric or neonatal complications following in vitro fertilization (IVF)? METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed from January 01, 2008, until October 31, 2021. The studies reporting quantitative data on at least one of the primary outcomes (birthweight and preterm birth) for the exposure group and the control group were included. For oxygen tension, independent meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager, comparing hypoxia/normoxia. For culture media, a network meta-analysis was carried out using R software, allowing the inclusion of articles comparing two or more culture media. RESULTS: After reviewing 182 records, 39 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 28 studies were kept for review. Meta-analysis about the impact of incubator type on perinatal outcomes could not be carried out because of a limited number of studies. For oxygen tension, three studies were included. The pairwise meta-analysis comparing hypoxia/normoxia did not show any statistical difference for birthweight and gestational age at birth. For culture media, 18 studies were included. The network meta-analysis failed to reveal any significant impact of different culture media on birthweight or preterm birth. CONCLUSION: No difference was observed for neonatal outcomes according to the embryo culture conditions evaluated in this review. Further research is needed about the safety of IVF culture conditions as far as future children's health is concerned.

Telomere length: a marker for reproductive aging?

The improvements accomplished in assisted reproductive technology have emphasized more than ever the role played by chronological age, notably for predicting oocyte quality. Studies in cellular aging have directed research on telomere length measurements as possible markers of functional aging and, notably, female reproductive outcomes. Although further research is still needed, encouraging results are already available on the possibility that leucocyte telomere length may be a useful parameter for assessing reproductive potential in aging women.

The Present and the Future of Medical Therapies for Adenomyosis: A Narrative Review.

Uterine Adenomyosis is a benign condition characterized by the presence of endometrium-like epithelial and stromal tissue in the myometrium. Several medical treatments have been proposed, but still, no guidelines directing the management of adenomyosis are available. While a hysterectomy is typically regarded as the definitive treatment for adenomyosis, the scarcity of high-quality data leaves patients desiring fertility with limited conservative options. Based on the available data, the levonorgestrel-IUD appears to offer the most favorable outcomes. Other treatments, including GnRH antagonists, dienogest, prolactin, and oxytocin modulators, show promise; however, further data are required to establish their efficacy definitively. Furthermore, there are many emerging therapies that have been developed that seem worthy of consideration in the near future. The aim of this narrative review was to explore the current medical treatments available for adenomyosis and to provide a glimpse of future therapies under assessment. For this scope, we performed a literature search on PubMed and Medline from incept to September 2022 using the keywords: "medical treatment", "non-steroidal anti-inflammatory", "progesterone intrauterine device", "dienogest", "combined oral contraceptives", "gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist", "gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist", "danazol", "aromatase inhibitors", "ulipristal acetate", "anti-platelet therapy", "dopamine", "oxytocin antagonists", "STAT3", "KRAS", "MAPK", "micro-RNA", "mifepristone", "valproic acid", "levo-tetrahydropalamatine", and "andrographolide". The search was limited to articles in English, with subsequent screening of abstracts. Abstracts were screened to select relevant studies.

Adenomyosis: An Updated Review on Diagnosis and Classification.

Adenomyosis is a commonly diagnosed benign condition characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands within the underlying myometrium. The most common presenting signs and symptoms are abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility. The clinical relevance of this condition is evident in both medical and surgical care. Histopathology and imaging studies are used for the diagnosis and classification of adenomyosis, which are hallmarks of the advancement of our ability to diagnose adenomyosis. Importantly, the diagnosis and classification of adenomyosis lacks standardization due to the nature of imaging techniques, features of adenomyosis, and the clinical spectrum of adenomyosis. We reviewed the literature to summarize the available classification systems for adenomyosis and highlight the different imaging approaches and histologic criteria used in diagnosis. Despite the high prevalence of the disease, there is no clear consensus on one classification system. We provide a review of some of the classification systems available and discuss their strengths and limitations.

Successful ART outcome in a woman with McCune-Albright syndrome: a case report and literature review.

McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS) is a rare genetic disease affecting multiple organs, including endocrine tissues. This endocrinopathy is sometimes responsible for infertility, as it may induce an independent functioning of the ovaries leading to anovulatory cycles. This case report describes the infertility journey of a 22-year-old female who had early puberty and irregular periods with high estrogen and progesterone levels, low FSH and LH (on day 3 of her menstrual cycle), and a multi-cystic right ovary. She received several infertility treatments: initially in vitro oocyte maturation (IVM) followed by cyst transvaginal ultrasound-guided aspiration, all unsuccessful. A right hemi-ovariectomy was performed that eventually restored regular cycles and made it possible to perform ovarian stimulation (OS) and in vitro fertilization (IVF). Live birth was obtained after the first embryo transfer.

Endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis and/or endometriosis.

A narrative review of endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis and/or endometriosis revealed that this parameter is difficult to assess in natural conception because both disorders alter natural fertility. Recent data emanating from assisted reproductive technology have allowed the study of endometrial receptivity in women affected by adenomyosis and endometriosis. This has upended our views on the effects of these 2 disorders on embryo implantation. Today, the very existence of altered receptivity in assisted reproductive technology is questioned. In this context, we now know that frozen euploid blastocyst transfers in estradiol and progesterone cycles have unaltered outcomes in both adenomyosis and endometriosis.

Recurrent implantation failure: reality or a statistical mirage?: Consensus statement from the July 1, 2022 Lugano Workshop on recurrent implantation failure.

IMPORTANCE: To date, recurrent implantation failure (RIF) has no clear definition and no clearly identified impaired function. Hence, the term RIF is currently used somewhat haphazardly, on the basis of clinicians' judgment. OBJECTIVE: International experts in reproductive medicine met on July 1, 2022, in Lugano, Switzerland, to review the different facets of RIF and define the diagnosis and its appropriate management. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review without meta-analysis of studies published in English from January 2015 to May 2022. FINDINGS: Data indicated that RIF has been largely overevaluated, overdiagnosed, and overtreated without sufficient critical assessment of its true nature. Our analyses show that true RIF is extremely uncommon-occurring in <5% of couples with infertility-and that reassurance and continued conventional therapies are warranted in most cases of assisted reproductive technology (ART) failure. Although the true biologic determinants of RIF may exist in a small subset of people with infertility, they elude the currently available tools for assessment. Without identification of the true underlying etiology(ies), it is reasonable not to assign this diagnosis to a patient until she has failed at least 3 euploid blastocyst transfers (or the equivalent number of unscreened embryo transfers, adjusted to the patient's age and corresponding euploidy rate). In addition, other factors should be ruled out that may contribute to her reduced odds of sustained implantation. In such cases, implantation failure should not be the only issue considered in case of ART failure because this may result from multiple other factors that are not necessarily repetitive or persistent. In reality, RIF impacting the probability of further ART success is a very rare occurrence. CONCLUSION: True RIF is extremely uncommon, occurring in <5% of couples with infertility. Reassurance and continued conventional therapies are warranted in most cases. It would seem reasonable not to assign this diagnosis to a patient until she has failed at least 3 euploid embryo transfers (or the equivalent number of unscreened embryos, adjusted to her age). RELEVANCE: Given the number of internationally recognized experts in the field present at the Lugano meeting 2022, our publication constitutes a consensus statement.

The impact of paternal age on cumulative assisted reproductive technology outcomes.

Objective: To investigate the impact of paternal age on cumulative live birth rate in ART. Design: Retrospective single-center cohort study. Patients: All female patients aged 18-43 years and male patients aged 18-60 years, who performed their first ART cycle between January 2018 and December 2020, were included. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome, cumulative live birth rate (cLBR), was estimated following fresh or frozen embryo transfers issued from an ART cycle. Secondary outcomes included the cumulative pregnancy rate (cPR) and miscarriage rate. Subgroup analyzes were performed as follows: men <45 and ≥ 45; female <35, 35-38, and > 38 years. Results: A total of 2,358 couples were included in this study. The sperm quantity of male patients within both age groups was divided in two groups: normal and abnormal, which were found to be in significantly equal proportions. There were significantly fewer current smokers in the male group ≥45. The cPR was 0.5301 in the group <45 and 0.3111 in the group ≥45, with a p-value <0.001. Analysis according to the female age revealed that, in the female group >38, the cLBR rate was 0.26 for men <45 and 0.19 for men ≥45, with a p-value of 0.061. Additionally, the cPR was 0.34 in the male group <45 and 0.21 in the group ≥45, with a p-value <0.001. In the female group between 35 and 38 years of age, the cLBR was 0.44 in the male group <45 and 0.3 in the male group ≥45, with a p-value of 0.031. The cPR was 0.49 in the male group <45 and 0.34 in the group ≥45, p = 0.036. Within the female group <35, we observed non-significant results. The miscarriage rate results were not significantly different for women ≤38. Conclusion: According to the results from our study, male age ≥ 45 has a significant impact on cumulative ART outcomes.

Limits imposed by the experimental design of a large prospective non-inferiority study on PGT-A invalidate many of the conclusions.

The New England Journal of Medicine recently published a large study addressing the efficacy of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). The 14-centre randomized control non-inferiority trial used cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) as a clinical endpoint to examine the value of PGT-A and concluded that conventional IVF was not inferior to IVF with PGT-A. Unfortunately, the experimental design was highly flawed; and in fact, the data generated in the study do not support the major conclusions presented in the publication. The embryos in each patient's three-embryo pool, which were available for transfer, were selected solely by morphology. The investigators then randomized patients to either the PGT-A group or the control group. It is important to note that PGT-A screening in the study group was done only after the embryos were selected. PGT-A was not really used in a meaningful way, which would have been for the PGT-A results to help in selecting which embryos would be in the three-embryo group. Thus, the outcomes were wholly determined prior to the study intervention. The ultimate delivery rate for each group of three embryos was determined when they were selected by morphology. The randomization, which occurred after embryo selection, would assure equal distribution of those cohorts destined to deliver and those destined to fail to the two study groups, the PGT-A and control groups. Thus, there was no potential for PGT-A to enhance selection and thus no possible way to improve the cumulative outcomes. Since there was no possible way for the control group to be inferior, the experimental design precluded any chance of evaluating the primary endpoint of the study. The primary question of the study was never evaluated. Another serious flaw was that the study was initiated prior to knowing how to interpret the data provided in the PGT-A analytical result. Specifically, the design excluded mosaic embryos from transfer despite the literature demonstrating the significant reproductive potential for these embryos. When accounting for the lost deliveries induced by this non-evidence-based decision, the expected delivery rates in the two groups become virtually identical. That is an important issue because the data from the study actually demonstrate the safety of PGT-A without diminution in outcomes from the impact of trophectoderm biopsy or the discarding of competent embryos which had wrongfully been considered aneuploid. A final serious flaw in the experimental design and interpretation of the data surrounding the issue of the miscarriage rate. The investigators noted that the miscarriage rate was lower in the PGT-A group but stated that its impact was insufficient to alter the CLBR. Of course, by design, the CLBRs were limited to being equivalent. There was no potential for enhanced outcomes in the PGT-A group and thus no possibility that the lower risk of miscarriage in the PGT-A group would raise the CLBR. The benefit of a lower miscarriage rate is real and significant. Its relevance should not be diminished based on the lack of a change in the CLBR since that was never possible in this study. The investigators of the study concluded that the CLBR with conventional ART is equivalent to that with PGT-A, but a simple review of the experiment reassigns their genuine findings to those of a safety study. Significantly, the data in the study demonstrate that the intervention of PGT-A is safe. This study neither supports nor refutes the efficacy of clinical PGT-A.